ACHR vs. BA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ACHR and BA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BA stands out with 153.22 billion USD in market value—about 25.79× ACHR’s market cap of 5.94 billion USD.
ACHR’s beta of 3.13 points to much larger expected swings compared to BA’s calmer 1.41, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ACHR | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Archer Aviation Inc. | The Boeing Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| CEO | Mr. Adam D. Goldstein | Mr. Robert K. Ortberg |
| Price | 10.82 USD | 203.21 USD |
| Market Cap | 5.94 billion USD | 153.22 billion USD |
| Beta | 3.13 | 1.41 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 18, 2020 | January 2, 1962 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ACHR and BA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ACHR and BA based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ACHR nor BA turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -8.37 and -13.30, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- BA shows a negative forward PEG of -6.09, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ACHR at 0.22 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- BA carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -46.04, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ACHR (P/B 4.25) has positive book value.
- ACHR and BA both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -13.16 and -12.01, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | ACHR | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -8.37 | -13.30 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.22 | -6.09 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 2.21 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 4.25 | -46.04 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -13.16 | -12.01 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -9.88 | -27.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 2.83 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -11.05 | -15.42 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ACHR nor BA currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ACHR | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ACHR and BA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- BA posts a quick ratio of 0.37, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ACHR at 15.80 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- BA has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -16.13), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ACHR at 0.08 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- ACHR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but BA is in the red with interest coverage -3.55, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ACHR | BA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 15.80 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 15.80 | 0.37 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | -16.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.34 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -3.55 |