Seek Returns logo

ACGL vs. WF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ACGL and WF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ACGL’s market capitalization of 33.42 billion USD is substantially larger than WF’s 12.55 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.52 for ACGL and 0.51 for WF, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

WF is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ACGL, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolACGLWF
Company NameArch Capital Group Ltd.Woori Financial Group Inc.
CountryBMKR
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - DiversifiedBanks - Regional
CEONicolas Alain Emmanuel PapadopouloJong-Yong Yim
Price89.19 USD50.68 USD
Market Cap33.42 billion USD12.55 billion USD
Beta0.520.51
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 14, 1995October 1, 2003
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ACGL and WF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ACGL vs. WF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ACGL

17.66%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.59%
Q3
17.66%
Median
12.77%
Q1
7.56%
Min
-4.43%

ACGL’s Return on Equity of 17.66% is on par with the norm for the Insurance - Diversified industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WF

9.19%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
19.20%
Q3
11.87%
Median
9.48%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-0.15%

WF’s Return on Equity of 9.19% is on par with the norm for the Banks - Regional industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ACGL

9.46%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
32.46%
Q3
16.21%
Median
9.46%
Q1
2.09%
Min
-10.51%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Insurance - Diversified industry.

WF

14.77%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
13.33%
Q3
7.16%
Median
5.31%
Q1
2.87%
Min
-3.49%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Banks - Regional industry.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ACGL

21.23%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
26.00%
Q3
19.46%
Median
9.37%
Q1
5.55%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.23% places ACGL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

WF

9.51%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
32.03%
Q3
21.35%
Median
16.99%
Q1
12.69%
Min
0.27%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, WF’s Net Profit Margin of 9.51% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ACGL

44.52%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
44.52%
Q3
25.84%
Median
14.16%
Q1
6.78%
Min
-2.60%

An Operating Profit Margin of 44.52% places ACGL in the upper quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

WF

29.13%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
40.01%
Q3
26.24%
Median
21.14%
Q1
15.85%
Min
1.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.13% places WF in the upper quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolACGLWF
Return on Equity (TTM)17.66%9.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.01%0.55%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)9.46%14.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.23%9.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)44.52%29.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)98.20%60.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ACGL

--

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
4.41
Q3
4.03
Median
2.86
Q1
2.82
Min
2.82

Current Ratio data for ACGL is currently unavailable.

WF

--

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
0.39
Q3
0.22
Median
0.15
Q1
0.10
Min
0.01

For the Banks - Regional industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ACGL

0.13

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
0.54
Q3
0.39
Median
0.27
Q1
0.21
Min
0.13

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, ACGL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

WF

2.43

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.74
Q3
0.81
Median
0.42
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.43, WF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Banks - Regional industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ACGL

73.83

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
19.23
Q3
17.46
Median
7.97
Q1
4.61
Min
-1.63

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 73.83, ACGL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

WF

1.35

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.84
Median
0.59
Q1
0.35
Min
-0.35

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks - Regional industry.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolACGLWF
Current Ratio (TTM)----
Quick Ratio (TTM)----
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.132.43
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.16
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.3853.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)73.831.35

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ACGL and WF. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ACGL

5.61%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
8.16%
Q3
5.54%
Median
2.46%
Q1
1.59%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.61%, ACGL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

WF

4.54%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
11.72%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.00%
Q1
1.68%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.54%, WF offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ACGL

50.74%

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
101.86%
Q3
53.36%
Median
21.69%
Q1
5.33%
Min
0.00%

ACGL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 50.74% is within the typical range for the Insurance - Diversified industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WF

9.26%

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
155.35%
Q3
50.05%
Median
34.14%
Q1
18.61%
Min
0.00%

WF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.26% is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolACGLWF
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.61%4.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)50.74%9.26%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ACGL

9.19

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
18.52
Q3
16.13
Median
13.33
Q1
9.73
Min
2.62

In the lower quartile for the Insurance - Diversified industry, ACGL’s P/E Ratio of 9.19 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WF

6.28

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
22.32
Q3
15.38
Median
12.31
Q1
10.72
Min
4.30

In the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry, WF’s P/E Ratio of 6.28 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ACGL

1.15

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
2.07
Median
1.20
Q1
0.77
Min
0.04

ACGL’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.15 is within the middle range of its peers in the Insurance - Diversified industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

WF

0.97

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.13
Median
1.25
Q1
0.71
Min
0.02

WF’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.97 is within the middle range of its peers in the Banks - Regional industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ACGL

1.88

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
3.08
Q3
2.00
Median
1.15
Q1
1.07
Min
0.38

ACGL’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WF

0.56

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.76
Median
2.17
Q1
1.71
Min
0.55

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks - Regional industry.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ACGL

1.61

Insurance - Diversified Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.80
Median
1.59
Q1
1.29
Min
0.74

ACGL’s P/B Ratio of 1.61 is within the conventional range for the Insurance - Diversified industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WF

0.53

Banks - Regional Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.35
Median
1.09
Q1
0.92
Min
0.33

WF’s P/B Ratio of 0.53 is in the lower quartile for the Banks - Regional industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ACGL vs. WF: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Insurance - Diversified and Banks - Regional industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolACGLWF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)9.196.28
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.150.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)1.880.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.610.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)5.127.11
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)8.6764.40
EV-to-Sales (TTM)1.973.30