ABT vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 15, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ABT and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	ABT	WFC
Company Name	Abbott Laboratories	Wells Fargo & Company
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Health Care	Financials
GICS Industry	Health Care Equipment & Supplies	Banks
Market Capitalization	233.69 billion USD	255.41 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	June 1, 1972
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	WFC
5-Day Price Return	0.96%	-0.96%
13-Week Price Return	0.79%	-2.52%
26-Week Price Return	2.01%	21.41%
52-Week Price Return	18.45%	39.49%
Month-to-Date Return	0.25%	-4.88%
Year-to-Date Return	18.71%	13.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume	6.11M	11.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.14M	15.87M
3-Month Volatility	23.30%	23.94%
Beta	0.73	1.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 29.93%
Q3: 16.99%
Median: 9.28%
Q1: 5.10%
Min: -12.52%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 24.41%
Q3: 13.71%
Median: 10.08%
Q1: 5.96%
Min: -5.58%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 31.09%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 15.07%
Q1: 8.48%
Min: -0.28%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	WFC
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.93%	11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)	17.41%	1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	32.43%	22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.34%	25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	56.20%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 5.19
Q3: 3.00
Median: 2.13
Q1: 1.44
Min: 0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 1.61
Q3: 0.76
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.14
Min: 0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 56.35
Q3: 25.56
Median: 9.60
Q1: 3.78
Min: -26.49

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WFC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	WFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.82	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.27	2.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	38.30	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.71%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 4.15%
Q3: 1.76%
Median: 0.79%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.71% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WFC

2.46%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 160.00%
Q3: 66.60%
Median: 27.49%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	WFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.71%	2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.42%	31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 67.29
Q3: 47.01
Median: 30.94
Q1: 23.91
Min: 10.79

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WFC

12.60

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.60 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.38

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 9.49
Q3: 5.41
Median: 2.86
Q1: 2.07
Min: 0.74

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 10.85
Q3: 6.56
Median: 3.53
Q1: 2.36
Min: 0.71

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABT vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	WFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	16.60	12.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	5.38	1.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.68	1.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	34.26	17.11