Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. TSLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and TSLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

TSLA’s market capitalization of 1,014.33 billion USD is significantly greater than ABT’s 233.90 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

TSLA carries a higher beta at 2.46, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABT (beta: 0.74) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolABTTSLA
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesTesla, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareConsumer Cyclical
IndustryMedical - DevicesAuto - Manufacturers
CEORobert B. FordElon R. Musk
Price134.44 USD315.35 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD1,014.33 billion USD
Beta0.742.46
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 29, 2010
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and TSLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. TSLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TSLA

9.03%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
103.41%
Q3
44.32%
Median
10.17%
Q1
-11.48%
Min
-70.38%

TSLA’s Return on Equity of 9.03% is on par with the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

TSLA

5.13%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
4.50%
Median
-5.87%
Q1
-40.39%
Min
-107.35%

In the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, TSLA’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TSLA

6.70%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
22.99%
Q3
5.16%
Median
-1.71%
Q1
-78.77%
Min
-149.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.70% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TSLA

6.59%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
29.04%
Q3
6.33%
Median
-2.21%
Q1
-66.44%
Min
-106.75%

An Operating Profit Margin of 6.59% places TSLA in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTTSLA
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%9.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%5.12%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%5.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%6.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%6.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%17.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TSLA

2.00

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.38

TSLA’s Current Ratio of 2.00 is in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TSLA

0.18

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
1.08
Q3
0.96
Median
0.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, TSLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TSLA

17.27

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
45.34
Q3
22.10
Median
2.42
Q1
-13.59
Min
-26.25

TSLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTTSLA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.782.00
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.271.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.18
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.10
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.60-0.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3917.27

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and TSLA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TSLA

0.00%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.57%
Q3
0.92%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TSLA

0.00%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
84.98%
Q3
20.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TSLA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTTSLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TSLA

158.31

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
47.41
Q3
24.64
Median
8.54
Q1
7.47
Min
4.69

At 158.31, TSLA’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

TSLA

3.77

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.14
Median
0.53
Q1
0.13
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Auto - Manufacturers industry.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TSLA

10.60

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
3.80
Median
1.28
Q1
0.60
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 10.60, TSLA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TSLA

13.59

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
13.96
Q3
7.23
Median
2.02
Q1
0.91
Min
0.31

TSLA’s P/B Ratio of 13.59 is in the upper tier for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABT vs. TSLA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTTSLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.40158.31
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.733.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.5210.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.8113.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.14149.61
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4972.43
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.6810.56