Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while TM’s is 228.21 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ABT’s beta of 0.74 points to significantly higher volatility compared to TM (beta: 0.25), suggesting ABT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

TM is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ABT, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolABTTM
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesToyota Motor Corporation
CountryUSJP
SectorHealthcareConsumer Cyclical
IndustryMedical - DevicesAuto - Manufacturers
CEORobert B. FordKoji Sato
Price134.44 USD174.89 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD228.21 billion USD
Beta0.740.25
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TM

13.43%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
103.41%
Q3
44.32%
Median
10.17%
Q1
-11.48%
Min
-70.38%

TM’s Return on Equity of 13.43% is on par with the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

TM

4.40%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
35.94%
Q3
4.50%
Median
-5.87%
Q1
-40.39%
Min
-107.35%

TM’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.40% is in line with the norm for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TM

9.92%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
22.99%
Q3
5.16%
Median
-1.71%
Q1
-78.77%
Min
-149.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.92% places TM in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TM

9.98%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
29.04%
Q3
6.33%
Median
-2.21%
Q1
-66.44%
Min
-106.75%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.98% places TM in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTTM
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%13.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%5.09%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%9.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%9.98%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%19.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TM

1.26

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.38

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Auto - Manufacturers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TM

1.08

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
1.08
Q3
0.96
Median
0.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.01

TM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Auto - Manufacturers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TM

25.15

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
45.34
Q3
22.10
Median
2.42
Q1
-13.59
Min
-26.25

TM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 25.15 is in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTTM
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.26
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.271.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.271.08
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.41
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.604.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3925.15

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and TM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TM

3.62%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.57%
Q3
0.92%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.62%, TM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Auto - Manufacturers industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TM

23.76%

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
84.98%
Q3
20.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.76% is in the upper quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%3.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%23.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TM

6.81

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
47.41
Q3
24.64
Median
8.54
Q1
7.47
Min
4.69

In the lower quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry, TM’s P/E Ratio of 6.81 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

TM

2.89

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
3.87
Q3
2.14
Median
0.53
Q1
0.13
Min
0.03

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Auto - Manufacturers industry.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TM

0.67

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
7.43
Q3
3.80
Median
1.28
Q1
0.60
Min
0.16

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 aligns with the market consensus for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

0.90

Auto - Manufacturers Industry

Max
13.96
Q3
7.23
Median
2.02
Q1
0.91
Min
0.31

TM’s P/B Ratio of 0.90 is in the lower quartile for the Auto - Manufacturers industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ABT vs. TM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Auto - Manufacturers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.406.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.732.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.520.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.810.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.14-25.51
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.498.19
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.681.36