Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. SHEL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and SHEL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while SHEL’s is 217.79 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ABT’s beta of 0.74 points to significantly higher volatility compared to SHEL (beta: 0.30), suggesting ABT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SHEL is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ABT, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolABTSHEL
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesShell plc
CountryUSGB
SectorHealthcareEnergy
IndustryMedical - DevicesOil & Gas Integrated
CEORobert B. FordWael Sawan
Price134.44 USD71.92 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD217.79 billion USD
Beta0.740.30
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980October 31, 1994
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and SHEL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. SHEL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SHEL

7.40%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
20.46%
Q3
15.43%
Median
12.48%
Q1
8.43%
Min
-1.92%

SHEL’s Return on Equity of 7.40% is in the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

SHEL

4.50%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
12.91%
Q3
9.65%
Median
7.06%
Q1
3.79%
Min
-0.29%

SHEL’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.50% is in line with the norm for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SHEL

4.81%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
9.89%
Median
8.06%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-0.64%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, SHEL’s Net Profit Margin of 4.81% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SHEL

9.73%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
30.12%
Q3
21.81%
Median
9.73%
Q1
7.69%
Min
4.28%

SHEL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.73% is around the midpoint for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%7.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%3.47%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%4.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%4.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%9.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%15.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SHEL

1.32

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
1.42
Median
1.24
Q1
0.93
Min
0.41

SHEL’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SHEL

0.43

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
1.22
Q3
0.83
Median
0.46
Q1
0.26
Min
0.14

SHEL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SHEL

5.68

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
33.34
Q3
16.73
Median
9.99
Q1
4.43
Min
1.03

SHEL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.32
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.271.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.43
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.20
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.600.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.395.68

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and SHEL. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SHEL

4.10%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
18.27%
Q3
6.79%
Median
4.63%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

SHEL’s Dividend Yield of 4.10% is consistent with its peers in the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

SHEL

63.90%

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
470.85%
Q3
105.45%
Median
60.50%
Q1
47.51%
Min
0.00%

SHEL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.90% is within the typical range for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%4.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%63.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SHEL

16.71

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
16.54
Q3
15.68
Median
11.70
Q1
10.25
Min
5.34

At 16.71, SHEL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

SHEL

1.82

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
1.60
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.46

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Oil & Gas Integrated industry.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SHEL

0.75

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
1.39
Q3
1.23
Median
0.82
Q1
0.61
Min
0.42

SHEL’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SHEL

1.26

Oil & Gas Integrated Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.77
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.71

SHEL’s P/B Ratio of 1.26 is within the conventional range for the Oil & Gas Integrated industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Oil & Gas Integrated industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4016.71
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.731.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.520.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.811.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.146.77
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.494.47
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.680.90