Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. SHEL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and SHEL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ABT is a standard domestic listing, while SHEL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolABTSHEL
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesShell plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareEnergy
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization230.51 billion USD209.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 12, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and SHEL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. SHEL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
5-Day Price Return2.44%1.45%
13-Week Price Return-2.29%7.61%
26-Week Price Return0.49%-0.30%
52-Week Price Return18.36%-1.55%
Month-to-Date Return4.95%-1.66%
Year-to-Date Return17.09%7.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.80M4.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.66M5.97M
3-Month Volatility24.22%18.39%
Beta0.701.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SHEL

7.40%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

SHEL’s Return on Equity of 7.40% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SHEL

5.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

SHEL’s Net Profit Margin of 5.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SHEL

9.81%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

SHEL’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.81% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%7.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%3.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%5.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%9.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%24.92%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SHEL

1.32

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

SHEL’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SHEL

0.43

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

SHEL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SHEL

-16.99

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

SHEL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -16.99. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.270.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.30-16.99

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. SHEL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. SHEL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SHEL

4.11%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

SHEL’s Dividend Yield of 4.11% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SHEL

63.10%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

SHEL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.10% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.73%4.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%63.10%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SHEL

15.36

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

SHEL’s P/E Ratio of 15.36 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SHEL

0.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

SHEL’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SHEL

1.28

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

SHEL’s P/B Ratio of 1.28 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. SHEL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTSHEL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4715.36
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.340.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.681.28
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.997.27