Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and SAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ABT is a standard domestic listing, while SAP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolABTSAP
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesSAP SE
CountryUnited StatesGermany
GICS SectorHealth CareInformation Technology
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesSoftware
Market Capitalization230.51 billion USD320.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980September 18, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and SAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. SAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTSAP
5-Day Price Return2.44%-0.88%
13-Week Price Return-2.29%-10.87%
26-Week Price Return0.49%-14.46%
52-Week Price Return18.36%20.56%
Month-to-Date Return4.95%-5.54%
Year-to-Date Return17.09%0.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.80M1.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.66M1.57M
3-Month Volatility24.22%25.86%
Beta0.700.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SAP

15.09%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

SAP’s Return on Equity of 15.09% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

SAP

18.23%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

SAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SAP

25.13%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.13% places SAP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTSAP
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%15.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%9.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%18.23%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%25.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%73.80%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SAP

1.03

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

SAP’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SAP

0.21

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

SAP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

SAP

32.64

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

SAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.64 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTSAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.03
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.270.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.3032.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. SAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SAP

0.99%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SAP’s Dividend Yield of 0.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SAP

161.64%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 161.64%, SAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTSAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.73%0.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%161.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SAP

42.26

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

SAP’s P/E Ratio of 42.26 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SAP

7.70

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

SAP’s P/S Ratio of 7.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SAP

7.74

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

SAP’s P/B Ratio of 7.74 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. SAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTSAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4742.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.347.70
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.687.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.9937.81