Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

PG’s market capitalization of 377.07 billion USD is significantly greater than ABT’s 233.90 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

ABT’s beta of 0.74 points to significantly higher volatility compared to PG (beta: 0.43), suggesting ABT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolABTPG
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesThe Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareConsumer Defensive
IndustryMedical - DevicesHousehold & Personal Products
CEORobert B. FordJon R. Moeller
Price134.44 USD160.83 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD377.07 billion USD
Beta0.740.43
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980January 13, 1978
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG

30.15%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
38.00%
Q3
32.25%
Median
24.06%
Q1
4.84%
Min
-18.42%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.15% is on par with the norm for the Household & Personal Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

PG

16.18%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
34.47%
Q3
21.03%
Median
9.28%
Q1
3.66%
Min
-4.23%

PG’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.18% is in line with the norm for the Household & Personal Products industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG

18.46%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
20.09%
Q3
12.77%
Median
8.06%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-6.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.46% places PG in the upper quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG

23.81%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
16.82%
Median
10.84%
Q1
5.76%
Min
-4.25%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.81% places PG in the upper quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTPG
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%30.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%12.60%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%16.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%18.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%23.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%51.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PG

0.71

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
3.05
Q3
1.96
Median
1.27
Q1
0.84
Min
0.71

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG

0.65

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.78
Median
0.87
Q1
0.40
Min
0.05

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Household & Personal Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PG

21.84

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
21.84
Q3
12.04
Median
3.71
Q1
1.13
Min
-1.74

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 21.84 is in the upper quartile for the Household & Personal Products industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTPG
Current Ratio (TTM)1.780.71
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.65
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.601.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3921.84

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and PG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PG

2.53%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.15%
Q3
3.16%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Household & Personal Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PG

63.04%

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
147.82%
Q3
68.54%
Median
51.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.04% is within the typical range for the Household & Personal Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%63.04%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PG

24.36

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
66.72
Q3
42.49
Median
24.63
Q1
20.39
Min
5.23

PG’s P/E Ratio of 24.36 is within the middle range for the Household & Personal Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

PG

3.89

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.42
Q3
4.43
Median
2.84
Q1
1.79
Min
0.43

PG’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.89 is within the middle range of its peers in the Household & Personal Products industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG

4.49

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
5.97
Q3
4.00
Median
2.38
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.49 is in the upper echelon for the Household & Personal Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PG

7.22

Household & Personal Products Industry

Max
38.54
Q3
20.07
Median
6.47
Q1
0.97
Min
0.38

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.22 is within the conventional range for the Household & Personal Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. PG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Household & Personal Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4024.36
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.733.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.524.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.817.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1425.10
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4917.19
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.684.79