Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. NVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABT and NVS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

With ABT at 231.49 billion USD and NVS at 222.75 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.

With betas of 0.74 for ABT and 0.53 for NVS, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

NVS is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike ABT, which is purely domestic.

SymbolABTNVS
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesNovartis AG
CountryUSCH
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - DevicesDrug Manufacturers - General
CEOMr. Robert B. FordDr. Vasant Narasimhan M.D.
Price133.05 USD112.78 USD
Market Cap231.49 billion USD222.75 billion USD
Beta0.740.53
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 7, 1996
ADRNoYes

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABT and NVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABT and NVS, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABTNVS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.2217.13
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.732.70
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.473.99
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.485.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)34.7713.20
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.9710.85
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.634.44
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)35.7814.71

Dividend Comparison

NVS stands out with a 3.79% dividend yield—around 121% above ABT’s 1.71%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.

SymbolABTNVS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.71%3.79%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABT and NVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • NVS’s current ratio of 0.79 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABT at 1.78 maintains healthy liquidity.
  • NVS posts a quick ratio of 0.61, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABT at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
SymbolABTNVS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.780.79
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.140.81
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.160.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3920.17