Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. MTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and MTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABTMTD
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesMettler-Toledo International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization230.51 billion USD27.13 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980November 14, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and MTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. MTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTMTD
5-Day Price Return2.44%0.25%
13-Week Price Return-2.29%13.61%
26-Week Price Return0.49%1.52%
52-Week Price Return18.36%-8.22%
Month-to-Date Return4.95%6.74%
Year-to-Date Return17.09%7.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.80M0.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.66M0.19M
3-Month Volatility24.22%28.76%
Beta0.701.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MTD

1,675.84%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

MTD’s Return on Equity of 1,675.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MTD

21.46%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.46% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTD

26.49%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.49% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTMTD
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%1,675.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%25.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%21.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%26.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%59.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTD

1.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

MTD’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTD

81.23

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 81.23, MTD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MTD

15.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

MTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTMTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.2781.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.3015.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTMTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.73%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTD

32.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

MTD’s P/E Ratio of 32.53 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MTD

6.98

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

MTD’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTD

1,299.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 1,299.40, MTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ABT vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTMTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4732.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.346.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.681,299.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.9931.84