Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. MTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABT and MTD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ABT dominates in value with a market cap of 231.49 billion USD, eclipsing MTD’s 23.55 billion USD by roughly 9.83×.

MTD carries a higher beta at 1.40, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABT remains steadier at 0.74.

SymbolABTMTD
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesMettler-Toledo International Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Diagnostics & Research
CEOMr. Robert B. FordMr. Patrick K. Kaltenbach
Price133.05 USD1,133.26 USD
Market Cap231.49 billion USD23.55 billion USD
Beta0.741.40
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980November 14, 1997
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABT and MTD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABT and MTD, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABTMTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.2227.85
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.732.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.476.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)2.487.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)34.7727.10
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.9721.22
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.636.67
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)35.7829.41

Dividend Comparison

ABT delivers a 1.71% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas MTD appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

SymbolABTMTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.71%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABT and MTD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • MTD posts a quick ratio of 0.70, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABT at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
SymbolABTMTD
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.140.64
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.160.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3916.23