Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. META: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and META, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

META’s market capitalization of 1,807.70 billion USD is significantly greater than ABT’s 233.90 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

META carries a higher beta at 1.27, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABT (beta: 0.74) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolABTMETA
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesMeta Platforms, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareCommunication Services
IndustryMedical - DevicesInternet Content & Information
CEORobert B. FordMark Elliot Zuckerberg
Price134.44 USD719.01 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD1,807.70 billion USD
Beta0.741.27
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980May 18, 2012
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and META by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. META: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

META

38.69%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
42.68%
Q3
9.10%
Median
3.28%
Q1
-14.17%
Min
-26.11%

In the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry, META’s Return on Equity of 38.69% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

META

26.21%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
31.34%
Q3
14.95%
Median
3.03%
Q1
-6.25%
Min
-25.52%

In the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry, META’s Return on Invested Capital of 26.21% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

META

39.11%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
39.11%
Q3
15.31%
Median
4.00%
Q1
-6.97%
Min
-36.95%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.11% places META in the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

META

42.92%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
42.92%
Q3
15.51%
Median
2.63%
Q1
-6.98%
Min
-18.41%

An Operating Profit Margin of 42.92% places META in the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTMETA
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%38.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%23.78%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%26.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%39.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%42.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%81.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

META

2.66

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
7.37
Q3
3.97
Median
2.42
Q1
1.67
Min
0.33

META’s Current Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the median group of the Internet Content & Information industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

META

0.27

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
0.55
Q3
0.49
Median
0.14
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

META’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Internet Content & Information industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

META

88.41

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
26.56
Q3
12.92
Median
3.11
Q1
-5.03
Min
-16.11

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 88.41, META demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Internet Content & Information industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTMETA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.782.66
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.272.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.27
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.18
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.600.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3988.41

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and META. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

META

0.29%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
8.40%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.29%, META offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Internet Content & Information industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

META

7.70%

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
112.27%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

META’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.70% is in the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTMETA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%0.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%7.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

META

27.27

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
56.51
Q3
39.89
Median
18.31
Q1
10.09
Min
0.08

META’s P/E Ratio of 27.27 is within the middle range for the Internet Content & Information industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

META

2.14

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.09
Median
0.83
Q1
0.47
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 2.14 places META in the upper quartile for the Internet Content & Information industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

META

10.61

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
6.47
Median
2.35
Q1
0.97
Min
0.66

META’s P/S Ratio of 10.61 is in the upper echelon for the Internet Content & Information industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

META

9.82

Internet Content & Information Industry

Max
12.17
Q3
6.35
Median
2.86
Q1
0.91
Min
0.02

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Internet Content & Information industry.

ABT vs. META: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Internet Content & Information industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTMETA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4027.27
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.732.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.5210.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.819.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1434.56
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4920.01
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.6810.73