Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. MA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and MA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABTMA
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesMastercard Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareFinancials
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization228.80 billion USD533.96 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 25, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and MA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. MA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTMA
5-Day Price Return-0.41%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return-1.11%2.80%
26-Week Price Return-2.56%5.95%
52-Week Price Return16.65%26.04%
Month-to-Date Return4.18%4.27%
Year-to-Date Return16.22%12.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.21M2.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.39M2.69M
3-Month Volatility23.93%21.20%
Beta0.700.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MA

191.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

MA’s Return on Equity of 191.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MA

44.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

A Net Profit Margin of 44.93% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MA

55.78%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.78% places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTMA
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%191.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%27.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%44.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%55.78%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MA

1.16

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MA

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MA

37.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTMA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.141.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.272.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.3037.93

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. MA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MA

0.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MA

19.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.15% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTMA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.73%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%19.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MA

39.22

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 39.22 places MA in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MA

17.62

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MA

64.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 64.98, MA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ABT vs. MA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTMA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4739.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.3417.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.6864.98
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.9933.58