Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while LIN’s is 223.87 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 0.74 for ABT and 0.98 for LIN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolABTLIN
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesLinde plc
CountryUSGB
SectorHealthcareBasic Materials
IndustryMedical - DevicesChemicals - Specialty
CEORobert B. FordSanjiv Lamba
Price134.44 USD475.58 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD223.87 billion USD
Beta0.740.98
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 17, 1992
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LIN

17.23%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

LIN

8.94%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

LIN’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.94% is in line with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN

20.02%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.02% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

26.42%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.42% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%17.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%7.99%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%8.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%20.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%26.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%42.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.94

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN

0.63

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LIN

34.75

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.75, LIN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTLIN
Current Ratio (TTM)1.780.94
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.63
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.29
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.601.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3934.75

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and LIN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LIN

1.22%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

LIN

40.75%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.75% is within the typical range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%1.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%40.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LIN

34.05

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

A P/E Ratio of 34.05 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

LIN

4.93

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.93 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LIN

6.78

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.78, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.92

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

LIN’s P/B Ratio of 5.92 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABT vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4034.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.734.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.526.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.815.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1445.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4919.26
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.687.34