Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. ISRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and ISRG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while ISRG’s is 195.15 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ISRG carries a higher beta at 1.68, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABT (beta: 0.74) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolABTISRG
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesIntuitive Surgical, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & Supplies
CEORobert B. FordGary S. Guthart
Price134.44 USD544.47 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD195.15 billion USD
Beta0.741.68
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980June 16, 2000
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and ISRG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. ISRG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ISRG

15.52%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
26.65%
Q3
13.00%
Median
1.08%
Q1
-8.11%
Min
-38.20%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, ISRG’s Return on Equity of 15.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ISRG

12.36%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
20.14%
Q3
7.36%
Median
1.97%
Q1
-6.22%
Min
-20.00%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, ISRG’s Return on Invested Capital of 12.36% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ISRG

28.41%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
28.95%
Q3
11.24%
Median
-2.83%
Q1
-12.85%
Min
-26.41%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.41% places ISRG in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ISRG

28.20%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
32.10%
Q3
16.03%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-7.96%
Min
-26.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.20% places ISRG in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTISRG
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%15.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%12.88%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%12.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%28.41%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%28.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%67.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ISRG

4.98

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
4.57
Median
2.64
Q1
1.81
Min
1.10

ISRG’s Current Ratio of 4.98 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ISRG

--

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.16
Min
0.03

Debt-to-Equity Ratio data for ISRG is currently unavailable.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ISRG

--

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
25.04
Q3
8.80
Median
3.66
Q1
-3.85
Min
-11.93

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ISRG is currently unavailable.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTISRG
Current Ratio (TTM)1.784.98
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.273.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.27--
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.16--
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.60-0.87
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.39--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and ISRG. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ISRG

0.00%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
4.02%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ISRG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ISRG

0.00%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
76.77%
Q3
11.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ISRG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTISRG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ISRG

78.61

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
45.65
Q3
44.10
Median
35.47
Q1
29.60
Min
21.65

At 78.61, ISRG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ISRG

4.99

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
5.80
Q3
3.68
Median
2.56
Q1
1.87
Min
0.22

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.99 places ISRG in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ISRG

22.39

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
12.87
Q3
6.95
Median
3.45
Q1
2.24
Min
0.71

With a P/S Ratio of 22.39, ISRG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ISRG

11.38

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
5.48
Median
3.37
Q1
1.95
Min
0.65

At 11.38, ISRG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ABT vs. ISRG: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTISRG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4078.61
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.734.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.5222.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.8111.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.14111.81
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4965.25
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.6822.10