Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while IBM’s is 271.36 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 0.74 for ABT and 0.65 for IBM, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolABTIBM
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesInternational Business Machines Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareTechnology
IndustryMedical - DevicesInformation Technology Services
CEORobert B. FordArvind Krishna
Price134.44 USD291.97 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD271.36 billion USD
Beta0.740.65
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980September 24, 1915
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

IBM

21.32%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

IBM’s Return on Equity of 21.32% is on par with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

IBM

8.48%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

IBM’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.48% is in line with the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

IBM

8.71%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

IBM’s Net Profit Margin of 8.71% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

IBM

16.36%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.36% places IBM in the upper quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%21.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%3.76%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%8.48%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%8.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%16.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%57.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IBM

1.01

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

IBM’s Current Ratio of 1.01 falls into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IBM

2.49

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Information Technology Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.49. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

IBM

5.92

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Information Technology Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTIBM
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.01
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.272.49
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.46
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.604.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.395.92

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and IBM. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

IBM

2.29%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.29%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Information Technology Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IBM

112.81%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 112.81% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%2.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%112.81%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

IBM

49.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

At 49.51, IBM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

IBM

9.51

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

IBM’s Forward PEG Ratio of 9.51 is exceptionally high for the Information Technology Services industry. This suggests its stock price is very high relative to its expected earnings growth, signaling significant overvaluation risk.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

IBM

4.32

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 4.32 is in the upper echelon for the Information Technology Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

10.08

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ABT vs. IBM: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Information Technology Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.4049.51
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.739.51
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.524.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.8110.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1422.73
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4926.54
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.685.21