ABT vs. HSBC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ABT and HSBC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ABT is a standard domestic listing, while HSBC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
Company Name	Abbott Laboratories	HSBC Holdings plc
Country	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Health Care	Financials
GICS Industry	Health Care Equipment & Supplies	Banks
Market Capitalization	230.51 billion USD	226.88 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	July 16, 1999
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and HSBC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. HSBC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
5-Day Price Return	2.44%	-1.12%
13-Week Price Return	-2.29%	6.24%
26-Week Price Return	0.49%	7.85%
52-Week Price Return	18.36%	44.56%
Month-to-Date Return	4.95%	2.37%
Year-to-Date Return	17.09%	20.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.80M	13.79M
3-Month Avg. Volume	6.66M	18.07M
3-Month Volatility	24.22%	16.86%
Beta	0.70	0.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 34.53%
Q3: 19.38%
Median: 9.52%
Q1: 4.86%
Min: -7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HSBC

13.86%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

HSBC’s Return on Equity of 13.86% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 23.34%
Q3: 13.06%
Median: 9.53%
Q1: 5.96%
Min: -3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

HSBC

34.16%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

HSBC’s Net Profit Margin of 34.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 29.44%
Q3: 17.80%
Median: 13.95%
Q1: 8.73%
Min: -3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HSBC

40.44%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

HSBC’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.44% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.93%	13.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)	17.41%	0.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	32.43%	34.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.34%	40.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	56.20%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 3.05
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.49
Min: 0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HSBC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.45
Q1: 0.14
Min: 0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HSBC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 58.29
Q3: 25.56
Median: 9.06
Q1: 3.60
Min: -28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

HSBC

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.82	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.27	1.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	38.30	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. HSBC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. HSBC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 4.05%
Q3: 1.76%
Median: 0.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HSBC

6.14%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.14%, HSBC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 160.00%
Q3: 72.47%
Median: 27.49%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HSBC

71.79%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

HSBC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.79% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.73%	6.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.42%	71.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 73.48
Q3: 51.69
Median: 34.31
Q1: 25.74
Min: 11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

HSBC

8.44

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

HSBC’s P/E Ratio of 8.44 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 9.53
Q3: 5.26
Median: 3.39
Q1: 2.13
Min: 0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

HSBC

1.74

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max: 10.85
Q3: 5.98
Median: 3.48
Q1: 2.43
Min: 0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HSBC

1.08

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

HSBC’s P/B Ratio of 1.08 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. HSBC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ABT	HSBC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	16.47	8.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	5.34	1.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.68	1.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	33.99	4.65