Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. GILD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and GILD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABTGILD
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesGilead Sciences, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesBiotechnology
Market Capitalization229.51 billion USD141.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980January 22, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and GILD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. GILD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTGILD
5-Day Price Return0.47%-3.25%
13-Week Price Return0.28%6.94%
26-Week Price Return-0.20%6.04%
52-Week Price Return17.64%50.40%
Month-to-Date Return4.50%1.66%
Year-to-Date Return16.59%23.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.40M5.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.54M7.68M
3-Month Volatility24.04%29.22%
Beta0.700.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GILD

32.97%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
77.14%
Q3
10.76%
Median
-20.08%
Q1
-42.71%
Min
-119.20%

In the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, GILD’s Return on Equity of 32.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

GILD

21.87%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
59.44%
Q3
16.21%
Median
-11.49%
Q1
-167.42%
Min
-409.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.87% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GILD

27.89%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.62%
Q3
20.76%
Median
-12.41%
Q1
-181.14%
Min
-482.02%

An Operating Profit Margin of 27.89% places GILD in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTGILD
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%32.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%11.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%21.87%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%27.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%78.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GILD

1.32

Biotechnology Industry

Max
19.31
Q3
9.38
Median
4.54
Q1
2.45
Min
0.76

GILD’s Current Ratio of 1.32 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GILD

1.27

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.64
Median
0.09
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

GILD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Biotechnology industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

GILD

1.71

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.91
Median
-7.81
Q1
-63.90
Min
-153.80

GILD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.71 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTGILD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.271.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.301.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. GILD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.73%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.73% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GILD

3.98%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GILD’s Dividend Yield of 3.98% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GILD

117.08%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 117.08%, GILD’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Biotechnology industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTGILD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.73%3.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%117.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.47

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GILD

23.57

Biotechnology Industry

Max
60.14
Q3
38.17
Median
29.01
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/E Ratio of 23.57 is within the middle range for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.34

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.34 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GILD

5.15

Biotechnology Industry

Max
76.98
Q3
36.53
Median
9.49
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

GILD’s P/S Ratio of 5.15 aligns with the market consensus for the Biotechnology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GILD

7.01

Biotechnology Industry

Max
20.53
Q3
9.76
Median
4.77
Q1
2.49
Min
0.59

GILD’s P/B Ratio of 7.01 is within the conventional range for the Biotechnology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABT vs. GILD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Biotechnology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTGILD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4723.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.345.15
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.687.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.9916.29