Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. BABA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and BABA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ABT’s market capitalization stands at 233.90 billion USD, while BABA’s is 259.33 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

ABT’s beta of 0.74 points to significantly higher volatility compared to BABA (beta: 0.21), suggesting ABT has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

BABA is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ABT, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolABTBABA
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesAlibaba Group Holding Limited
CountryUSCN
SectorHealthcareConsumer Cyclical
IndustryMedical - DevicesSpecialty Retail
CEORobert B. FordYongming Wu
Price134.44 USD108.7 USD
Market Cap233.90 billion USD259.33 billion USD
Beta0.740.21
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateMarch 17, 1980September 19, 2014
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and BABA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. BABA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ABT

30.76%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
49.04%
Q3
9.53%
Median
-7.46%
Q1
-32.83%
Min
-82.64%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 30.76% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BABA

13.33%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

BABA’s Return on Equity of 13.33% is on par with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ABT

19.13%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
21.88%
Q3
6.63%
Median
-1.11%
Q1
-21.08%
Min
-51.95%

In the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s Return on Invested Capital of 19.13% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

BABA

7.90%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

BABA’s Return on Invested Capital of 7.90% is in line with the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ABT

31.89%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
44.80%
Q3
9.77%
Median
-5.53%
Q1
-29.37%
Min
-87.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.89% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BABA

13.06%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.06% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ABT

16.97%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
30.13%
Q3
13.12%
Median
3.47%
Q1
-24.42%
Min
-80.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.97% places ABT in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BABA

14.14%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.14% places BABA in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTBABA
Return on Equity (TTM)30.76%13.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.58%7.21%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)19.13%7.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.89%13.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%14.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.89%39.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ABT

1.78

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
12.68
Q3
6.30
Median
4.05
Q1
1.85
Min
0.01

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BABA

1.55

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

BABA’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Specialty Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ABT

0.27

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.09
Median
0.37
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Medical - Devices industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BABA

0.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, BABA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ABT

15.39

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
18.18
Q3
7.53
Median
0.85
Q1
-9.80
Min
-33.94

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.39 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BABA

19.85

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

BABA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 19.85 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTBABA
Current Ratio (TTM)1.781.55
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.271.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.270.25
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.160.14
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.600.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.3919.85

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ABT and BABA. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ABT

1.70%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
3.57%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, ABT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BABA

1.87%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.87%, BABA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ABT

28.92%

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
102.12%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.92% is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Devices industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BABA

22.23%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BABA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.23% is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTBABA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.70%1.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.92%22.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ABT

17.40

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
90.56
Q3
56.92
Median
43.19
Q1
21.79
Min
5.55

In the lower quartile for the Medical - Devices industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 17.40 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BABA

1.79

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

BABA’s P/E Ratio of 1.79 is below the typical range for the Specialty Retail industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ABT

1.73

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
6.56
Q3
3.52
Median
2.22
Q1
0.55
Min
0.03

ABT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

BABA

0.17

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, BABA’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.17 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ABT

5.52

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
15.74
Q3
8.12
Median
3.40
Q1
2.37
Min
0.42

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Medical - Devices industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BABA

1.84

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

BABA’s P/S Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ABT

4.81

Medical - Devices Industry

Max
16.65
Q3
8.03
Median
3.73
Q1
1.92
Min
0.65

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.81 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Devices industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BABA

0.23

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

BABA’s P/B Ratio of 0.23 is below the established floor for the Specialty Retail industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

ABT vs. BABA: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Medical - Devices and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTBABA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)17.401.79
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.730.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.521.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)4.810.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)35.1428.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)21.4910.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)5.681.95