Seek Returns logo

ABT vs. ATR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABT and ATR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABTATR
Company NameAbbott LaboratoriesAptarGroup, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareMaterials
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization233.69 billion USD8.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980April 23, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABT and ATR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABT vs. ATR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABTATR
5-Day Price Return0.96%-1.18%
13-Week Price Return0.79%-17.60%
26-Week Price Return2.01%-11.48%
52-Week Price Return18.45%-17.06%
Month-to-Date Return0.25%-1.53%
Year-to-Date Return18.71%-16.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.11M0.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume6.14M0.43M
3-Month Volatility23.30%24.82%
Beta0.730.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABT

29.93%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s Return on Equity of 29.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ATR

15.30%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

ATR’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

32.43%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

ABT’s Net Profit Margin of 32.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ATR

10.86%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

ATR’s Net Profit Margin of 10.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABT

17.34%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

ABT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.34% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATR

14.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.26% places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABTATR
Return on Equity (TTM)29.93%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.41%8.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.43%10.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.34%14.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.20%38.32%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

1.82

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

ABT’s Current Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ATR

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

ATR’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

0.27

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

ABT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATR

0.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, ATR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.40 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABT

38.30

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

ABT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.30 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ATR

16.67

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.67, ATR demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABTATR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.821.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.270.40
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)38.3016.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABT vs. ATR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABT vs. ATR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABT

1.71%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Yield of 1.71% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ATR

1.38%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Yield of 1.38% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABT

28.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATR

30.61%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

ATR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.61% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABTATR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.71%1.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.42%30.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABT

16.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, ABT’s P/E Ratio of 16.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ATR

22.12

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 22.12 places ATR in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABT

5.38

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

ABT’s P/S Ratio of 5.38 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ATR

2.40

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, ATR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABT

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

ABT’s P/B Ratio of 4.68 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ATR

3.83

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

ATR’s P/B Ratio of 3.83 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABT vs. ATR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABTATR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.6022.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.382.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.683.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.2625.35