ABNB vs. WMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and WMT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
WMT stands out with 771.53 billion USD in market value—about 9.66× ABNB’s market cap of 79.88 billion USD.
ABNB’s beta of 1.15 points to much larger expected swings compared to WMT’s calmer 0.70, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ABNB | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Walmart Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Travel Services | Discount Stores |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. C. Douglas McMillon |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 96.43 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 771.53 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 0.70 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | August 25, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and WMT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and WMT, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 39.84 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 4.61 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 8.51 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 60.94 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 21.16 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 1.21 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 64.98 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while WMT provides a 0.92% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.92% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and WMT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- WMT’s current ratio of 0.82 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- WMT posts a quick ratio of 0.24, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas WMT (at 11.34) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.82 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.24 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 11.34 |