ABNB vs. WING: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and WING, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing WING’s 9.00 billion USD by roughly 8.88×.
WING carries a higher beta at 1.76, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABNB remains steadier at 1.15.
| Symbol | ABNB | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Wingstop Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Restaurants |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Michael J. Skipworth CPA |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 322.48 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 9.00 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.76 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | June 12, 2015 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and WING over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABNB and WING based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- WING carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -12.80, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ABNB (P/B 9.98) has positive book value.
| Symbol | ABNB | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 53.15 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.11 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 13.82 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | -12.80 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 100.59 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 35.79 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 15.38 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 111.95 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while WING provides a 0.33% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.33% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and WING, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- WING has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -1.77), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ABNB at 0.29 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- WING carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.82, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while ABNB at 0.09 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas WING (at 6.28) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | WING |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 3.56 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 3.56 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | -1.77 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 1.82 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.28 |