ABNB vs. MGM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and MGM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing MGM’s 8.54 billion USD by roughly 9.36×.
MGM carries a higher beta at 1.79, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABNB remains steadier at 1.15.
| Symbol | ABNB | MGM |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | MGM Resorts International |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. William Joseph Hornbuckle IV |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 31.37 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 8.54 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.79 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | May 2, 1988 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and MGM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and MGM, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | MGM |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 13.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.90 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 0.50 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 3.16 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 7.50 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 15.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 2.20 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 33.14 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor MGM currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | MGM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and MGM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- MGM is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 11.03), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ABNB at 0.29, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas MGM (at 4.41) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | MGM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 1.31 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 1.26 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 11.03 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.75 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 4.41 |