Seek Returns logo

ABNB vs. MGA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABNB and MGA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABNBMGA
Company NameAirbnb, Inc.Magna International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobile Components
Market Capitalization76.51 billion USD12.54 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 10, 2020October 5, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABNB and MGA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABNB vs. MGA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABNBMGA
5-Day Price Return0.26%-0.60%
13-Week Price Return-8.52%20.18%
26-Week Price Return-11.40%10.53%
52-Week Price Return4.89%9.35%
Month-to-Date Return-5.63%8.47%
Year-to-Date Return-4.91%2.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.37M0.92M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.11M1.51M
3-Month Volatility30.08%27.61%
Beta1.131.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABNB

32.19%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

ABNB’s Return on Equity of 32.19% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABNB

22.67%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.67% places ABNB in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABNB

22.50%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.50% places ABNB in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABNBMGA
Return on Equity (TTM)32.19%10.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.03%3.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.67%2.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.50%4.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)72.06%13.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABNB

1.23

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

ABNB’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABNB

0.26

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, ABNB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABNB

-3.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

ABNB has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.65. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABNBMGA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.231.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.210.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.260.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.658.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABNB vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABNB vs. MGA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABNB

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABNB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABNB

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ABNB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABNBMGA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.35%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.88%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABNB

29.57

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

ABNB’s P/E Ratio of 29.57 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABNB

6.70

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

ABNB’s P/S Ratio of 6.70 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABNB

10.50

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

ABNB’s P/B Ratio of 10.50 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABNB vs. MGA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobile Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABNBMGA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.5710.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.700.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.500.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.026.83