ABNB vs. MAR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and MAR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ABNB at 79.88 billion USD and MAR at 71.40 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.39 for MAR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | MAR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Marriott International, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Anthony G. Capuano Jr. |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 260.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 71.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.39 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | March 23, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and MAR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABNB and MAR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MAR carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -22.90, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ABNB (P/B 9.98) has positive book value.
| Symbol | ABNB | MAR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 29.30 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.80 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 2.81 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | -22.90 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 38.78 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 20.87 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 3.42 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 47.11 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MAR provides a 0.97% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ABNB | MAR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.97% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and MAR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- MAR’s current ratio of 0.45 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- MAR posts a quick ratio of 0.45, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- MAR has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -5.00), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ABNB at 0.29 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas MAR (at 5.31) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | MAR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.45 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | -5.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.59 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 5.31 |