ABNB vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and LULU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing LULU’s 36.53 billion USD by roughly 2.19×.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.30 for LULU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Lululemon Athletica Inc. |
| Country | US | CA |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Apparel - Retail |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Calvin R. McDonald |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 317.56 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 36.53 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.30 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | July 27, 2007 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and LULU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and LULU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 21.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.63 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 3.45 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 8.94 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 23.07 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 12.73 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 3.41 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 22.81 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor LULU currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and LULU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither ABNB nor LULU records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ABNB | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 2.16 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 1.38 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |