ABNB vs. KDP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ABNB’s market capitalization of 88.10 billion USD is substantially larger than KDP’s 44.51 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ABNB’s beta of 1.14 points to significantly higher volatility compared to KDP (beta: 0.50), suggesting ABNB has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABNB and KDP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

This section compares the market valuation of ABNB and KDP. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.

• KDP’s Forward PEG ratio of 4.37 is very high. This signifies that its current stock price is notably elevated compared to its anticipated earnings growth rate, possibly indicating that the market has already factored in, or even exceeded, realistic future performance expectations.
• ABNB’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 11.00 is very high. This often indicates that the market values the company significantly above its net asset value, usually reflecting strong profitability, valuable intangible assets (like brand or patents), or high expectations for future growth.

Dividend Comparison

ABNB currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while KDP provides a 2.76% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section evaluates the financial strength of ABNB and KDP. Noteworthy observations on their financial resilience, considered from an industry perspective, are detailed in the points that follow.

• KDP’s current ratio of 0.47 falls into the low category. This can indicate potential stress on the company's ability to address its short-term liabilities, suggesting that its liquid assets may not provide a strong safety margin over its immediate financial commitments, possibly impacting its operational flexibility.
• KDP’s quick ratio of 0.31 is low. This indicates that its readily available liquid assets, excluding inventory, might provide a thin cushion for its short-term obligations, highlighting potential constraints on its immediate debt-paying ability without selling inventory.