Seek Returns logo

ABNB vs. FND: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABNB and FND, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing FND’s 8.01 billion USD by roughly 9.97×.

FND carries a higher beta at 1.80, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABNB remains steadier at 1.15.

SymbolABNBFND
Company NameAirbnb, Inc.Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryTravel ServicesHome Improvement
CEOMr. Brian CheskyMr. Thomas V. Taylor Jr.
Price127.52 USD74.42 USD
Market Cap79.88 billion USD8.01 billion USD
Beta1.151.80
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 10, 2020April 27, 2017
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABNB and FND over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and FND, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABNBFND
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.2038.92
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.522.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.111.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.983.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.1664.09
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2319.66
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.642.16
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)16.9578.23

Dividend Comparison

Neither ABNB nor FND currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolABNBFND
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and FND, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • FND posts a quick ratio of 0.27, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ABNB at 1.27 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
  • ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FND (at 113.22) covers its interest obligations.
SymbolABNBFND
Current Ratio (TTM)1.271.22
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.88
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.090.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--113.22