ABNB vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and FLUT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing FLUT’s 42.40 billion USD by roughly 1.88×.
With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.18 for FLUT, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABNB | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Flutter Entertainment plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Travel Services | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Jeremy Peter Jackson |
| Price | 127.52 USD | 239.96 USD |
| Market Cap | 79.88 billion USD | 42.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.15 | 1.18 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | October 4, 2002 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and FLUT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and FLUT, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.20 | 68.89 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.11 | 2.96 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 9.98 | 4.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 18.16 | 50.24 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 29.23 | 23.27 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.64 | 3.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 16.95 | 55.05 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNB nor FLUT currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABNB | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and FLUT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FLUT’s current ratio of 0.95 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ABNB at 1.27 maintains healthy liquidity.
- ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FLUT (at 2.21) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ABNB | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.95 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 2.21 |