Seek Returns logo

ABNB vs. F: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABNB and F, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing F’s 40.93 billion USD by roughly 1.95×.

With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.55 for F, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolABNBF
Company NameAirbnb, Inc.Ford Motor Company
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryTravel ServicesAuto - Manufacturers
CEOMr. Brian CheskyMr. James Duncan Farley Jr.
Price127.52 USD10.48 USD
Market Cap79.88 billion USD40.93 billion USD
Beta1.151.55
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 10, 2020June 1, 1972
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABNB and F over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and F, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABNBF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.208.29
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.520.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.110.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.980.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.164.40
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2313.55
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.640.97
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)16.9519.11

Dividend Comparison

ABNB offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while F provides a 7.16% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.

SymbolABNBF
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%7.16%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and F, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • F is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.53), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ABNB at 0.29, which maintains a steadier capital structure.
  • ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas F (at 3.72) covers its interest obligations.
SymbolABNBF
Current Ratio (TTM)1.271.13
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.270.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.293.53
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.090.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--3.72