Seek Returns logo

ABNB vs. DECK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABNB and DECK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ABNB dominates in value with a market cap of 79.88 billion USD, eclipsing DECK’s 18.72 billion USD by roughly 4.27×.

With betas of 1.15 for ABNB and 1.11 for DECK, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

SymbolABNBDECK
Company NameAirbnb, Inc.Deckers Outdoor Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustryTravel ServicesApparel - Footwear & Accessories
CEOMr. Brian CheskyMr. Stefano Caroti
Price127.52 USD123.36 USD
Market Cap79.88 billion USD18.72 billion USD
Beta1.151.11
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateDecember 10, 2020October 15, 1993
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABNB and DECK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABNB and DECK, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABNBDECK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.2019.88
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.521.72
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.113.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)9.987.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)18.1618.65
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)29.2313.48
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.643.40
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)16.9516.68

Dividend Comparison

Neither ABNB nor DECK currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

SymbolABNBDECK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABNB and DECK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • ABNB shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas DECK (at 411.69) covers its interest obligations.
SymbolABNBDECK
Current Ratio (TTM)1.273.17
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.272.61
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.290.10
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.090.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--411.69