ABNB vs. COST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABNB and COST, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
COST’s market capitalization of 439.14 billion USD is significantly greater than ABNB’s 84.90 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
With betas of 1.14 for ABNB and 0.99 for COST, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
| Symbol | ABNB | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Airbnb, Inc. | Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Defensive |
| Industry | Travel Services | Discount Stores |
| CEO | Mr. Brian Chesky | Mr. Ron M. Vachris |
| Price | 135.54 USD | 990.21 USD |
| Market Cap | 84.90 billion USD | 439.14 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.14 | 0.99 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 10, 2020 | July 9, 1986 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABNB and COST over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of ABNB and COST. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- COST’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 56.05 is very high. This signifies that its stock is trading at a premium, likely reflecting market optimism about its future growth, though it also implies a higher risk if these growth expectations are not met.
- COST’s Forward PEG ratio of 5.10 is very high. This signifies that its current stock price is notably elevated compared to its anticipated earnings growth rate, possibly indicating that the market has already factored in, or even exceeded, realistic future performance expectations.
- ABNB’s Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 10.60 and COST’s P/B ratio of 16.21 are both very high. For ABNB, this typically means the market assigns a much greater value to the company than its net accounting worth, often due to factors like robust intangible assets or superior growth prospects. COST’s high P/B also suggests investors have high expectations for its future performance and are pricing it well above its book value.
| Symbol | ABNB | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 33.16 | 56.05 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.64 | 5.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.56 | 1.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 10.60 | 16.21 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 31.01 | 37.43 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.09 | 1.61 |
Dividend Comparison
ABNB currently offers no dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while COST provides a 0.48% dividend yield, offering investors a component of income return.
| Symbol | ABNB | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for ABNB and COST in the table below.
| Symbol | ABNB | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.27 | 0.52 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.29 | 0.30 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.09 | 0.11 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | -2.07 | -0.49 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 916.73 |