Seek Returns logo

ABM vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABM and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolABMCTAS
Company NameABM Industries IncorporatedCintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization2.85 billion USD81.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABM and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABM vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABMCTAS
5-Day Price Return2.06%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return-2.84%-7.64%
26-Week Price Return-1.67%-1.42%
52-Week Price Return-9.66%-1.31%
Month-to-Date Return0.98%-1.29%
Year-to-Date Return-9.01%10.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.47M2.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.58M1.68M
3-Month Volatility21.67%16.88%
Beta0.780.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABM

6.42%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

ABM’s Return on Equity of 6.42% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABM

1.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, ABM’s Net Profit Margin of 1.34% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABM

3.04%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

ABM’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.04% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABMCTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)6.42%41.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.22%19.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.34%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.04%22.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.48%50.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABM

1.49

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

ABM’s Current Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABM

0.84

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ABM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.84 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABM

2.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, ABM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.70 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABMCTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.492.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.371.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.840.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.7024.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABM vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABM vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABM

2.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

ABM’s Dividend Yield of 2.21% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CTAS

0.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.75% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABM

38.71%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

ABM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.71% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABMCTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.21%0.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.71%33.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABM

24.76

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

ABM’s P/E Ratio of 24.76 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS

44.91

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 44.91 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABM

0.33

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, ABM’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CTAS

7.87

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.87, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABM

1.57

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

ABM’s P/B Ratio of 1.57 is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ABM vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABMCTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.7644.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.337.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.5719.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.8546.32