Seek Returns logo

ABEV vs. CELH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABEV and CELH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ABEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CELH is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolABEVCELH
Company NameAmbev S.A.Celsius Holdings, Inc.
CountryBrazilUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization34.30 billion USD15.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateMarch 5, 1997January 22, 2007
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABEV and CELH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABEV vs. CELH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABEVCELH
5-Day Price Return1.16%-0.46%
13-Week Price Return-14.26%68.84%
26-Week Price Return9.70%130.70%
52-Week Price Return-5.64%53.04%
Month-to-Date Return-2.01%32.75%
Year-to-Date Return4.00%128.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume26.24M6.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume28.53M6.81M
3-Month Volatility19.45%49.69%
Beta0.211.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABEV

15.38%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

ABEV’s Return on Equity of 15.38% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CELH

9.04%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CELH’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABEV

16.08%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.08% places ABEV in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CELH

7.91%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CELH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABEV

24.69%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.69% places ABEV in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CELH

10.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CELH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.40% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABEVCELH
Return on Equity (TTM)15.38%9.04%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.85%5.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%7.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.69%10.40%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.50%50.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

1.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

ABEV’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CELH

2.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CELH’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

0.03

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, ABEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CELH

0.42

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CELH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

5.64

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

ABEV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CELH

-55.00

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

CELH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -55.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABEVCELH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.112.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.781.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.64-55.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABEV vs. CELH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABEV vs. CELH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABEV

6.65%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.65%, ABEV offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Beverages industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CELH

0.17%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

85.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

ABEV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.75% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CELH

13.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CELH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABEVCELH
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.65%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.75%13.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

12.89

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, ABEV’s P/E Ratio of 12.89 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CELH

121.52

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

At 121.52, CELH’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Beverages industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

2.07

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

ABEV’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CELH

9.61

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 9.61, CELH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

2.27

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

ABEV’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CELH

5.72

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

CELH’s P/B Ratio of 5.72 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ABEV vs. CELH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABEVCELH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.89121.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.079.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.275.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.7875.94