Seek Returns logo

ABEV vs. CCU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ABEV and CCU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both ABEV and CCU are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolABEVCCU
Company NameAmbev S.A.Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
CountryBrazilChile
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesBeverages
Market Capitalization34.30 billion USD2.25 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 5, 1997September 24, 1992
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ABEV and CCU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ABEV vs. CCU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolABEVCCU
5-Day Price Return1.16%-2.37%
13-Week Price Return-14.26%-10.88%
26-Week Price Return9.70%-4.15%
52-Week Price Return-5.64%-1.03%
Month-to-Date Return-2.01%2.26%
Year-to-Date Return4.00%2.48%
10-Day Avg. Volume26.24M0.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume28.53M0.51M
3-Month Volatility19.45%22.24%
Beta0.210.64

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ABEV

15.38%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

ABEV’s Return on Equity of 15.38% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CCU

11.29%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

CCU’s Return on Equity of 11.29% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ABEV

16.08%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.08% places ABEV in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CCU

5.59%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

CCU’s Net Profit Margin of 5.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ABEV

24.69%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.69% places ABEV in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CCU

8.64%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

CCU’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.64% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolABEVCCU
Return on Equity (TTM)15.38%11.29%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.85%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.08%5.59%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.69%8.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.50%45.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

1.11

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

ABEV’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCU

2.16

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

CCU’s Current Ratio of 2.16 is in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

0.03

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, ABEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CCU

0.91

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CCU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.91 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

5.64

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

ABEV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCU

3.07

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CCU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.07 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolABEVCCU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.112.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.781.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.643.07

Growth

Revenue Growth

ABEV vs. CCU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ABEV vs. CCU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ABEV

6.65%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.65%, ABEV offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Beverages industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCU

3.74%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

CCU’s Dividend Yield of 3.74% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

85.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

ABEV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.75% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCU

59.74%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CCU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.74% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolABEVCCU
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.65%3.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)85.75%59.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

12.89

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, ABEV’s P/E Ratio of 12.89 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CCU

13.14

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CCU’s P/E Ratio of 13.14 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ABEV

2.07

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

ABEV’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCU

0.74

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, CCU’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ABEV

2.27

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

ABEV’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCU

1.73

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

CCU’s P/B Ratio of 1.73 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ABEV vs. CCU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Beverages industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolABEVCCU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.8913.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.070.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.271.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.789.80