ABBV vs. ZTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and ZTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing ZTS’s 71.87 billion USD by roughly 4.47×.
ZTS carries a higher beta at 0.94, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABBV remains steadier at 0.55.
Symbol | ABBV | ZTS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | Zoetis Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Ms. Kristin C. Peck |
Price | 181.8 USD | 161.44 USD |
Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 71.87 billion USD |
Beta | 0.55 | 0.94 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | February 1, 2013 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and ZTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and ZTS, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | ABBV | ZTS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | 28.70 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | 2.96 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 7.74 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 15.52 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 31.51 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | 19.31 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 8.28 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 33.71 |
Dividend Comparison
ABBV’s dividend yield of 3.51% is about 204% higher than ZTS’s 1.15%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | ABBV | ZTS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 1.15% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and ZTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ZTS at 1.74 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ZTS at 1.04 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while ZTS at 1.45 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
Symbol | ABBV | ZTS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 1.74 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 1.04 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 1.45 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.48 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 15.55 |