Seek Returns logo

ABBV vs. ZTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at ABBV and ZTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing ZTS’s 71.87 billion USD by roughly 4.47×.

ZTS carries a higher beta at 0.94, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABBV remains steadier at 0.55.

SymbolABBVZTS
Company NameAbbVie Inc.Zoetis Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - GeneralDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
CEOMr. Robert A. Michael CPAMs. Kristin C. Peck
Price181.8 USD161.44 USD
Market Cap321.13 billion USD71.87 billion USD
Beta0.550.94
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJanuary 2, 2013February 1, 2013
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABBV and ZTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and ZTS, please refer to the table below.

SymbolABBVZTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)76.6228.70
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)7.162.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.607.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)226.3515.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)20.8731.51
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.5819.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)6.738.28
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)25.0833.71

Dividend Comparison

ABBV’s dividend yield of 3.51% is about 204% higher than ZTS’s 1.15%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.

SymbolABBVZTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.51%1.15%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and ZTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ZTS at 1.74 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
  • ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ZTS at 1.04 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
  • ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while ZTS at 1.45 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
SymbolABBVZTS
Current Ratio (TTM)0.761.74
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.641.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)49.221.45
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.510.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.1415.55