ABBV vs. ZBH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and ZBH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing ZBH’s 18.35 billion USD by roughly 17.50×.
With betas of 0.55 for ABBV and 0.78 for ZBH, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABBV | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Devices |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Mr. Ivan Tornos |
| Price | 181.8 USD | 92.74 USD |
| Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 18.35 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.78 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | July 25, 2001 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and ZBH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and ZBH, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABBV | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | 25.75 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | 3.45 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 2.38 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 1.35 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 12.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | 13.49 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 3.14 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 16.80 |
Dividend Comparison
ABBV’s dividend yield of 3.51% is about 239% higher than ZBH’s 1.04%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ABBV | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 1.04% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and ZBH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ZBH at 3.30 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ZBH at 1.97 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while ZBH at 0.52 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | ABBV | ZBH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 3.30 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 1.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 0.52 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.32 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 6.00 |