ABBV vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and UNH, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ABBV at 321.13 billion USD and UNH at 274.85 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.55 for ABBV and 0.57 for UNH, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ABBV | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Healthcare Plans |
| CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Mr. Stephen J. Hemsley |
| Price | 181.8 USD | 302.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 274.85 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | October 17, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and UNH over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and UNH, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ABBV | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | 12.58 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | 0.82 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 0.67 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 2.93 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 11.05 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | 10.13 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 0.80 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 13.09 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ABBV and UNH offer similar dividend yields (3.51% vs. 2.77%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | ABBV | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 2.77% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and UNH, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.76 and 0.85, both ABBV and UNH have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas UNH at 0.85 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while UNH at 0.86 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
| Symbol | ABBV | UNH |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 0.86 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.26 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 16.30 |