ABBV vs. MDGL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ABBV dominates in value with a market cap of 321.13 billion USD, eclipsing MDGL’s 6.09 billion USD by roughly 52.74×.

MDGL carries a higher beta at -0.92, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ABBV remains steadier at 0.55.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ABBV and MDGL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ABBV and MDGL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• MDGL shows a negative P/E of -15.48, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ABBV at 76.62 trades on solid profitability.
• MDGL shows a negative forward PEG of -0.83, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ABBV at 7.16 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
• MDGL reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -15.18, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ABBV at 20.87 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

ABBV delivers a 3.51% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas MDGL appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and MDGL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MDGL at 5.91 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
• ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MDGL at 5.58 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
• ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while MDGL at 0.17 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
• ABBV meets its interest obligations (ratio 6.14). In stark contrast, MDGL’s negative ratio (-30.09) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.