ABBV vs. ABT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ABBV and ABT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ABBV at 321.13 billion USD and ABT at 231.49 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
With betas of 0.55 for ABBV and 0.74 for ABT, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | ABBV | ABT |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AbbVie Inc. | Abbott Laboratories |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Devices |
CEO | Mr. Robert A. Michael CPA | Mr. Robert B. Ford |
Price | 181.8 USD | 133.05 USD |
Market Cap | 321.13 billion USD | 231.49 billion USD |
Beta | 0.55 | 0.74 |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
IPO Date | January 2, 2013 | March 17, 1980 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ABBV and ABT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ABBV and ABT, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | ABBV | ABT |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 76.62 | 17.22 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 7.16 | 1.73 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 5.60 | 5.47 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 226.35 | 2.48 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 20.87 | 34.77 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 23.58 | 22.97 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 6.73 | 5.63 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 25.08 | 35.78 |
Dividend Comparison
ABBV’s dividend yield of 3.51% is about 105% higher than ABT’s 1.71%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
Symbol | ABBV | ABT |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.51% | 1.71% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ABBV and ABT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ABBV’s current ratio of 0.76 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while ABT at 1.78 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- ABBV’s quick ratio of 0.64 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas ABT at 1.27 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- ABBV is heavily leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 49.22), which can boost returns but raises risk if borrowing costs climb, while ABT at 0.14 keeps leverage at a more moderate level.
Symbol | ABBV | ABT |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.76 | 1.78 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.64 | 1.27 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 49.22 | 0.14 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 0.16 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.14 | 15.39 |