Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. XOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and XOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLXOM
Company NameApple Inc.Exxon Mobil Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization3,809.38 billion USD486.86 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and XOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. XOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLXOM
5-Day Price Return0.81%1.29%
13-Week Price Return22.26%2.78%
26-Week Price Return15.01%-4.07%
52-Week Price Return13.75%-6.84%
Month-to-Date Return0.81%1.29%
Year-to-Date Return2.50%6.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume46.69M16.56M
3-Month Avg. Volume55.24M16.72M
3-Month Volatility24.22%19.42%
Beta1.110.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

154.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 154.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

XOM

11.73%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

XOM’s Return on Equity of 11.73% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

24.30%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 24.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

XOM

9.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

XOM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.87%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

XOM

12.31%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

XOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.31% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLXOM
Return on Equity (TTM)154.92%11.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)28.95%6.84%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%9.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.87%12.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.68%29.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.87

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XOM

1.25

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

XOM’s Current Ratio of 1.25 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

AAPL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.54. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XOM

0.15

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, XOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

XOM

20.20

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

XOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLXOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.871.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.88
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.540.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.5120.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.40%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XOM

3.55%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

15.47%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.47% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XOM

55.57%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.57% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLXOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%3.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.47%55.57%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

38.42

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

A P/E Ratio of 38.42 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

XOM

15.64

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

XOM’s P/E Ratio of 15.64 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

9.33

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 9.33, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

XOM

1.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

XOM’s P/S Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

46.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 46.55, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XOM

1.77

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

XOM’s P/B Ratio of 1.77 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAPL vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLXOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.4215.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.331.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.551.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)39.6616.65