AAPL vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and UBER, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing UBER’s 185.42 billion USD by roughly 16.28×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.43 for UBER, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Dara Khosrowshahi |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 88.67 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 185.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.43 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | May 10, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and UBER over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and UBER, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 15.10 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 4.09 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 8.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 23.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 27.56 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 4.22 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 24.58 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas UBER appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and UBER, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while UBER at 1.02 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas UBER at 1.02 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas UBER (at 7.94) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.51 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 7.94 |