AAPL vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and TTWO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing TTWO’s 40.02 billion USD by roughly 75.42×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.09 for TTWO, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Strauss H. Zelnick Esq., J.D. |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 226.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 40.02 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.09 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | April 15, 1997 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and TTWO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and TTWO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- TTWO shows a negative P/E of -8.95, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AAPL at 31.14 trades on solid profitability.
- TTWO shows a negative forward PEG of -0.30, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AAPL at 2.85 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- TTWO reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -80.92, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAPL at 30.65 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAPL | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | -8.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | -0.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 7.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 18.75 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | -80.92 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | -11.55 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 7.13 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | -81.17 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas TTWO appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and TTWO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.82 and 0.78, both AAPL and TTWO have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AAPL (quick ratio 0.78) and TTWO (quick ratio 0.78) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AAPL shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but TTWO is in the red with interest coverage -86.19, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AAPL | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -86.19 |