AAPL vs. TER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and TER, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing TER’s 12.67 billion USD by roughly 238.23×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.70 for TER, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
Symbol | AAPL | TER |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Apple Inc. | Teradyne, Inc. |
Country | US | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors |
CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Gregory Stephen Smith |
Price | 202.09 USD | 78.98 USD |
Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 12.67 billion USD |
Beta | 1.27 | 1.70 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | September 14, 1970 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and TER over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and TER, please refer to the table below.
Symbol | AAPL | TER |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 22.10 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.69 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 4.36 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 3.44 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 20.82 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 17.14 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 4.22 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 20.15 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AAPL and TER offer similar dividend yields (0.50% vs. 0.46%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
Symbol | AAPL | TER |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and TER, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while TER at 2.70 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas TER at 2.17 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but TER is in the red with interest coverage -6055.69, signaling a net operating loss.
Symbol | AAPL | TER |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 2.70 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 2.17 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.02 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -6055.69 |