AAPL vs. SAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and SAP, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dwarfs SAP in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 8.67 times the 348.12 billion USD of its counterpart.
AAPL at 1.27 and SAP at 0.95 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Quick note: SAP sports an ADR tag, marking it as a foreign player on U.S. exchanges, unlike the homegrown AAPL.
| Symbol | AAPL | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | SAP SE |
| Country | US | DE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Christian Klein |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 298.41 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 348.12 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.275 | 0.952 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | September 18, 1995 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and SAP over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and SAP, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 53.56 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 2.70 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 8.73 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 6.72 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 56.14 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 27.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 8.41 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 54.07 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AAPL at 0.50% and SAP at 0.89% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet SAP’s 0.89% yield, 79% above AAPL’s 0.50%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AAPL leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | AAPL | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.89% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and SAP, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to SAP, sitting at 1.17, where liabilities are comfortably met.
- AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, SAP lands at 1.17, with enough liquidity to spare.
- AAPL posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while SAP at 8.41 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | AAPL | SAP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 1.17 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.17 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 8.41 |