Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. QCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and QCOM, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

AAPL dwarfs QCOM in market cap, clocking in at 3,018.38 billion USD—about 18.17 times the 166.14 billion USD of its counterpart.

AAPL at 1.27 and QCOM at 1.29 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.

SymbolAAPLQCOM
Company NameApple Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsSemiconductors
CEOMr. Timothy D. CookMr. Cristiano Renno Amon
Price202.09 USD151.31 USD
Market Cap3,018.38 billion USD166.14 billion USD
Beta1.2751.292
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980December 13, 1991
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and QCOM over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and QCOM, please refer to the table below.

SymbolAAPLQCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)31.1415.13
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.853.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.543.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)45.366.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)30.6514.19
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.2413.07
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.714.10
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)31.3614.83

Dividend Comparison

Both AAPL at 0.50% and QCOM at 2.25% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet QCOM’s 2.25% yield, 350% above AAPL’s 0.50%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while AAPL leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.

SymbolAAPLQCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.50%2.25%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and QCOM, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AAPL posts a current ratio of 0.82 under 1, where current assets fall short of covering short-term debts—manageable perhaps with solid cash inflows. Compare that to QCOM, sitting at 2.73, where liabilities are comfortably met.
  • AAPL’s quick ratio sits at 0.78 below 0.8, leaving its cash and near-cash assets shy of short-term obligations—potentially a stretch without extra funds. Meanwhile, QCOM lands at 2.08, with enough liquidity to spare.
  • AAPL posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while QCOM at 22.61 handles interest with solid earnings.
SymbolAAPLQCOM
Current Ratio (TTM)0.822.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.782.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.470.53
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.300.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--22.61