AAPL vs. PANW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and PANW, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing PANW’s 120.01 billion USD by roughly 25.15×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.02 for PANW, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Nikesh Arora C.F.A. |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 181.26 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 120.01 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.02 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | July 20, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and PANW over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and PANW based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PANW shows a negative forward PEG of -0.95, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AAPL at 2.85 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | AAPL | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 95.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | -0.95 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 14.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 18.74 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 40.33 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 78.26 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 13.85 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 39.88 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas PANW appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and PANW, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.82 and 0.84, both AAPL and PANW have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas PANW at 0.84 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas PANW (at 591.06) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.14 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 591.06 |