AAPL vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and MU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing MU’s 107.11 billion USD by roughly 28.18×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.21 for MU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Sanjay Mehrotra |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 95.84 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 107.11 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.21 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | June 1, 1984 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and MU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 22.87 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 13.61 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 9.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 3.66 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 14.56 |
Dividend Comparison
Both AAPL and MU offer similar dividend yields (0.50% vs. 0.48%), indicating comparable approaches to balancing income and growth.
| Symbol | AAPL | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and MU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while MU at 3.13 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas MU at 1.99 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas MU (at 11.94) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 3.13 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 1.99 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.31 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.20 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 11.94 |