AAPL vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and MSTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing MSTR’s 110.10 billion USD by roughly 27.42×.
MSTR carries a higher beta at 3.81, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AAPL remains steadier at 1.27.
| Symbol | AAPL | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | MicroStrategy Incorporated |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Phong Q. Le |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 402.69 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 110.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 3.81 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | June 11, 1998 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and MSTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AAPL and MSTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- MSTR shows a negative P/E of -19.34, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AAPL at 31.14 trades on solid profitability.
- MSTR reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -5.36, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AAPL at 30.65 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AAPL | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | -19.34 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 0.07 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 239.72 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 79.17 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | -5.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | -14.54 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 239.82 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | -5.37 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL delivers a 0.50% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas MSTR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AAPL | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and MSTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.82 and 0.66, both AAPL and MSTR have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AAPL (quick ratio 0.78) and MSTR (quick ratio 0.66) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AAPL shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but MSTR is in the red with interest coverage -229.74, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AAPL | MSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 0.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 0.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.08 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -229.74 |