AAPL vs. META: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AAPL and META, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AAPL dominates in value with a market cap of 3,018.38 billion USD, eclipsing META’s 1,597.74 billion USD by roughly 1.89×.
With betas of 1.27 for AAPL and 1.24 for META, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AAPL | META |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Apple Inc. | Meta Platforms, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Communication Services |
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Internet Content & Information |
| CEO | Mr. Timothy D. Cook | Mr. Mark Elliot Zuckerberg |
| Price | 202.09 USD | 635.5 USD |
| Market Cap | 3,018.38 billion USD | 1,597.74 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.27 | 1.24 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | December 12, 1980 | May 18, 2012 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AAPL and META over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between AAPL and META, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | AAPL | META |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 31.14 | 24.10 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 1.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 7.54 | 9.38 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 45.36 | 8.68 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 30.65 | 30.54 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.24 | 18.72 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 7.71 | 9.50 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 31.36 | 30.94 |
Dividend Comparison
AAPL’s dividend yield of 0.50% is about 57% higher than META’s 0.32%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | AAPL | META |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.50% | 0.32% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AAPL and META, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AAPL’s current ratio of 0.82 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while META at 2.66 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AAPL’s quick ratio of 0.78 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas META at 2.66 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AAPL shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas META (at 148.01) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | AAPL | META |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 2.66 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.78 | 2.66 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 0.27 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 0.18 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 148.01 |