Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLLIN
Company NameApple Inc.Linde plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyMaterials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsChemicals
Market Capitalization3,371.15 billion USD224.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
5-Day Price Return-1.47%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return12.81%4.11%
26-Week Price Return-7.23%3.42%
52-Week Price Return1.17%3.50%
Month-to-Date Return9.44%3.82%
Year-to-Date Return-9.29%14.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume45.67M1.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume54.54M1.73M
3-Month Volatility22.43%12.80%
Beta1.080.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

154.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 154.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

24.30%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 24.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.87%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)154.92%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)28.95%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.87%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.68%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.87

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.54, AAPL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.870.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.830.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.540.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.5133.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.46%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

15.47%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.47% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.47%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

33.94

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

A P/E Ratio of 33.94 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

8.25

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 8.25, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

46.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 46.55, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.9433.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.256.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.555.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.0344.62