Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AAPL’s market capitalization of 3,189.54 billion USD is substantially larger than LIN’s 223.87 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.21 for AAPL and 0.98 for LIN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAAPLLIN
Company NameApple Inc.Linde plc
CountryUSGB
SectorTechnologyBasic Materials
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsChemicals - Specialty
CEOTimothy D. CookSanjiv Lamba
Price213.55 USD475.58 USD
Market Cap3,189.54 billion USD223.87 billion USD
Beta1.210.98
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateDecember 12, 1980June 17, 1992
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AAPL

151.31%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 151.31% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LIN

17.23%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
34.45%
Q3
15.78%
Median
7.65%
Q1
2.96%
Min
-12.04%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AAPL

47.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

AAPL’s Return on Invested Capital of 47.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

LIN

8.94%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
10.99%
Median
5.25%
Q1
3.06%
Min
-8.62%

LIN’s Return on Invested Capital of 8.94% is in line with the norm for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AAPL

24.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.30% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LIN

20.02%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
23.23%
Q3
10.64%
Median
5.14%
Q1
0.64%
Min
-8.93%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.02% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AAPL

31.81%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.81% places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LIN

26.42%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
26.42%
Q3
15.81%
Median
10.07%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-7.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.42% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)151.31%17.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)29.37%7.99%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)47.30%8.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%20.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.81%26.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.63%42.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AAPL

0.82

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the median group of the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LIN

0.94

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.95
Q3
2.60
Median
2.04
Q1
1.60
Min
0.77

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AAPL

1.47

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

AAPL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.47 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LIN

0.63

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
1.10
Median
0.73
Q1
0.55
Min
0.01

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.63 is typical for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AAPL

--

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AAPL is currently unavailable.

LIN

34.75

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
13.69
Q3
9.06
Median
5.24
Q1
1.68
Min
-3.09

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.75, LIN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Current Ratio (TTM)0.820.94
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.780.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)1.470.63
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.300.29
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.501.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--34.75

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AAPL and LIN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AAPL

0.47%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.47% is consistent with its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LIN

1.22%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
9.19%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.46%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.22% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals - Specialty industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AAPL

15.74%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.74% is within the typical range for the Consumer Electronics industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LIN

40.75%

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
163.70%
Q3
57.04%
Median
30.02%
Q1
12.51%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.75% is within the typical range for the Chemicals - Specialty industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.47%1.22%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.74%40.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AAPL

32.91

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

AAPL’s P/E Ratio of 32.91 is within the middle range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

34.05

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
56.68
Q3
33.75
Median
23.45
Q1
16.09
Min
7.50

A P/E Ratio of 34.05 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AAPL

3.79

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

LIN

4.93

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
3.23
Median
1.64
Q1
0.96
Min
0.16

A Forward PEG Ratio of 4.93 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AAPL

7.97

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 7.97, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Consumer Electronics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LIN

6.78

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
2.31
Median
1.38
Q1
0.89
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.78, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AAPL

47.94

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

At 47.94, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Electronics industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LIN

5.92

Chemicals - Specialty Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.78
Median
1.56
Q1
1.27
Min
0.35

LIN’s P/B Ratio of 5.92 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals - Specialty industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

AAPL vs. LIN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Consumer Electronics and Chemicals - Specialty industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)32.9134.05
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.794.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)7.976.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)47.945.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)32.3945.58
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)23.4719.26
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.147.34